123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129 |
- .. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-2.0-UK
- ************************
- Yocto Project Compatible
- ************************
- ============
- Introduction
- ============
- After the introduction of layers to OpenEmbedded, it quickly became clear
- that while some layers were popular and worked well, others developed a
- reputation for being "problematic". Those were layers which didn't
- interoperate well with others and tended to assume they controlled all
- the aspects of the final output. This usually isn't intentional but happens
- because such layers are often created by developers with a particular focus
- (e.g. a company's :term:`BSP<Board Support Package (BSP)>`) whilst the end
- users have a different one (e.g. integrating that
- :term:`BSP<Board Support Package (BSP)>` into a product).
- As a result of noticing such patterns and friction between layers, the project
- developed the "Yocto Project Compatible" badge program, allowing layers
- following the best known practises to be marked as being widely compatible
- with other ones. This takes the form of a set of "yes/no" binary answer
- questions where layers can declare if they meet the appropriate criteria.
- In the second version of the program, a script was added to make validation
- easier and clearer, the script is called ``yocto-check-layer`` and is
- available in :term:`OpenEmbedded-Core (OE-Core)`.
- See :ref:`dev-manual/layers:making sure your layer is compatible with yocto project`
- for details.
- ========
- Benefits
- ========
- :ref:`overview-manual/yp-intro:the yocto project layer model` is powerful
- and flexible: it gives users the ultimate power to change pretty much any
- aspect of the system but as with most things, power comes with responsibility.
- The Yocto Project would like to see people able to mix and match BSPs with
- distro configs or software stacks and be able to merge succesfully.
- Over time, the project identified characteristics in layers that allow them
- to operate well together. "anti-patterns" were also found, preventing layers
- from working well together.
- The intent of the compatibility program is simple: if the layer passes the
- compatibility tests, it is considered "well behaved" and should operate
- and cooperate well with other compatible layers.
- The benefits of compatibility can be seen from multiple different user and
- member perspectives. From a hardware perspective
- (a :ref:`overview-manual/concepts:bsp layer`), compatibility means the
- hardware can be used in many different products and use cases without
- impacting the software stacks being run with it. For a company developing
- a product, compatibility gives you a specification / standard you can
- require in a contract and then know it will have certain desired
- characteristics for interoperability. It also puts constraints on how invasive
- the code bases are into the rest of the system, meaning that multiple
- different separate hardware support layers can coexist (e.g. for multiple
- product lines from different hardware manufacturers). This can also make it
- easier for one or more parties to upgrade those system components for security
- purposes during the lifecycle of a product.
- ==================
- Validating a layer
- ==================
- The badges are available to members of the Yocto Project (as member benefit)
- and to open source projects run on a non-commercial basis. However, anyone can
- answer the questions and run the script.
- The project encourages all layer maintainers to review the questions and the
- output from the script against their layer, as the way some layers are
- constructed often has unintended consequences. The questions and the script
- are designed to highlight known issues which are often easy to solve. This
- makes layers easier to use and therefore more popular.
- It is intended that over time, the tests will evolve as new best known
- practices are identified, and as new interoperability issues are found,
- unnecessarily restricting layer interoperability. If anyone becomes aware of
- either type, please let the project know through the
- :yocto_home:`technical calls </public-virtual-meetings/>`,
- the :yocto_home:`mailing lists </community/mailing-lists/>`
- or through the :oe_wiki:`Technical Steering Committee (TSC) </TSC>`.
- The TSC is responsible for the technical criteria used by the program.
- Layers are divided into three types:
- - :ref:`"BSP" or "hardware support"<overview-manual/concepts:bsp layer>`
- layers contain support for particular pieces of hardware. This includes
- kernel and boot loader configuration, and any recipes for firmware or
- kernel modules needed for the hardware. Such layers usually correspond
- to a :term:`MACHINE` setting.
- - :ref:`"distro" layers<overview-manual/concepts:distro layer>` defined
- as layers providing configuration options and settings such as the
- choice of init system, compiler and optimisation options, and
- configuration and choices of software components. This would usually
- correspond to a :term:`DISTRO` setting.
- - "software" layers are usually recipes. A layer might target a
- particular graphical UI or software stack component.
- Here are key best practices the program tries to encourage:
- - A layer should clearly show who maintains it, and who change
- submissions and bug reports should be sent to.
- - Where multiple types of functionality are present, the layer should
- be internally divided into sublayers to separate these components.
- That's because some users may only need one of them and separability
- is a key best practice.
- - Adding a layer to a build should not modify that build, unless the
- user changes a configuration setting to activate the layer, by selecting
- a :term:`MACHINE`, a :term:`DISTRO` or a :term:`DISTRO_FEATURES` setting.
- - Layers should be documenting where they don’t support normal "core"
- functionality such as where debug symbols are disabled or missing, where
- development headers and on-target library usage may not work or where
- functionality like the SDK/eSDK would not be expected to work.
- The project does test the compatibility status of the core project layers on
- its :doc:`Autobuilder </test-manual/understand-autobuilder>`.
- The official form to submit compatibility requests with is at
- :yocto_home:`/ecosystem/branding/compatible-registration/`.
- Applicants can display the badge they get when their application is successful.
|